Prepare for the Arkansas Foundations of Reading Test (FORT) with our comprehensive quiz. Engage with multiple-choice questions and thorough explanations designed to enhance your understanding and knowledge, ensuring you are ready for your exam!

Practice this question and more.


Which source is NOT typically considered valid reading research?

  1. ERIC

  2. Harvard Educational Review

  3. Language Arts

  4. Wikipedia

The correct answer is: Wikipedia

The reasoning behind identifying Wikipedia as a source that is not typically considered valid reading research lies in its nature as an open-source platform. Unlike the other options, which are reputable and peer-reviewed sources that publish scholarly articles and research findings, Wikipedia is a collaborative platform that allows anyone to contribute and edit content. This open-access model means that the information may lack rigorous verification and quality control that are standard in academic research. Consequently, while Wikipedia can provide a general overview or quick reference on various topics, it does not meet the academic and scholarly criteria that characterize valid research sources. In educational settings and research contexts, relying on peer-reviewed journals and databases like ERIC, Harvard Educational Review, and Language Arts is preferred for accurate and trustworthy information.